From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47244: 28.0.50; SIGSEGV in long-runnning Emacs Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:32:37 +0200 Message-ID: <106ce987-1a45-bbdf-3897-445baa99a476@gmx.at> References: <87im5ofp3z.fsf@md5i.com> <16b279ef-a1c2-cd41-b18c-69383174c72a@gmx.at> <87a6qs7z60.fsf@md5i.com> <83eeg3kawg.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2e6kp9t.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuouknpb.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg4eknh5.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1jykmt0.fsf@gnu.org> <2d0dbdc8-3678-cd21-234a-9c63bb004629@gmx.at> <834kgrifrt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29966"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 47244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 16:33:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbuc-0007ei-Q0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:33:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbub-0001UA-OU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbu3-0001J2-Vy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbu2-0000da-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbu2-0004nM-B7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47244.161720117618420 (code B ref 47244); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2021 14:32:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbtv-0004n2-UP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:45543) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRbtt-0004mJ-Hk for 47244@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:32:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1617201160; bh=2/Ne8BZ4gn6qA7ohQx9xUD9MdWaqHzMMecNxf0+G204=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=VhiyDaEK68kxxP0B71oUP/Uq5gJ6E83qfuZEWaTmVguhgtEIQtH3uSsHKhPo/Ps/4 WmiyntuPu3pAdTC/CpEt+vUj0+JM+QWxOcX5dzIdEPlBOn0yrSLfwchLtWMveo68df 0cyR/QcPp0eHDYD8tu4CpwHP3DIHXyF96JE8FSVI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.108]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MOREi-1lG93e1Fbq-00Px1h; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:32:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834kgrifrt.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:JyKUNngFERHDBc1ZrkG3ImZZayGaN2gYm3TYRCkLCTqoz4QjctS ANaYxkNhVZDVUeUtHjhBMbnzylaV9xIM2sGqO1bLaAHTHta/lfqT3Emt8usnjrb+3GB6DkI 8cVO2uWiPmK/IG4doEhKttwYZ1nzXIdfKrm+ycTRFYagTSguTsz4vHxm0x1q0AisdYPa/rf d72Zj5KPq1POhJGGgp1rw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Caqo4H7J2Ks=:sEbC4dZfcNdFFqjP8MFdo5 Y4503XgSfHnEb7pP0jj2LzP/P8xovRWzVK+2x0F7NK0SYkgSGL5eST+fegfn2/AcpjnKRRtCg FTjsNnGyRrYDAT8C1sY//yov3oXKv5M5MMW1S8UxVtU2ZFgMjnuMjKD7NOuD4B6uDWR69eSl4 iCCW8SFo3uWS5A0Xuq7kqT8ysKzNy14IiZVnmQGuLZz1j5MWdRHU+VEXQcu0Aa/5RG3oOND8x LzsvYMjSg9Uu5WYf8i2pDNDqJVj2JSdDYxqyDpvOROL0eEopGtGEbYSD3O5t9TlL/vx0RmCxs VVv64fdsyddEWH29oUgMC6DgrOVJ6hpP6MDyWYOqjzk1PcY7zPvAiNiZqdc4CO1xI7TPkm7iC L3P6zTxl7VPyVq83Jn6ERTo0izKH1qgrXXVyoIsCr3y6bSnbu/YEhsaXgKsviWPcFPdEzDBCK jUSQ8d1t3/SDNJheIH2tBwZE3TPEgQM4kuEEdgywfP6yp5/I1ppXpanLnz4av1yFH1iVIHczE BRPRHfQ2Q/YPF8/D4/05ns4iEQMDJDTYSXZM+W5OCxg2A1+5Fsc11meVNtygP/T4CxcU8kS9E mKzw3sI3x8apFWFtMNkBM26QTRdN84UNhemwx9J1wz89wb78UMjy82bffsoetxp+fvA2iM7/N cD1gQ1rUz88WGAuC6jl8j+9YXng/CwogctTsLmOl6fXU7Kh6whSJtGR4FYIAKfxteu8kQhyxW +MJOf984WmmogaBgqxrHYLanaAVF79ElgceopV4U3yTtjp9oeGgM6uiJHwkm/53nS5bQuVo2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203367 Archived-At: >> #0 raise (sig=) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 >> set = { >> __val = {402653184, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 268435456, 0, 0, 93824994300624, 18446744067266838271} >> } >> pid = >> tid = >> #1 0x00005555557197a1 in terminate_due_to_signal >> (sig=6, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at ../../master/src/emacs.c:416 >> #2 0x00005555557c4858 in die >> (msg=0x55555594f2a0 "b->window_count == 0", file=0x55555594da8a "../../master/src/buffer.c", line=1969) at ../../master/src/alloc.c:7420 >> #3 0x0000555555759190 in Fkill_buffer (buffer_or_name=XIL(0x555557888814)) >> at ../../master/src/buffer.c:1969 >> buffer = XIL(0x555557889325) >> b = 0x555557889320 >> tem = XIL(0) >> m = 0x0 > > So replace_buffer_in_windows didn't do its job? Why did replace_buffer_in_windows_safely then apparently fail too? What is the value of b->window_count here? Unless we managed to botch that's buffer's window count, I can't see how replace_buffer_in_windows_safely could have possibly failed. martin