From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17895: 24.3.91; electric-indent-mode not quite right with comments in fortran-mode Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1038ejeanf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87vbrgahqp.fsf@gnu.org> <29110.37851.774372.21428@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404335056 5778 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2014 21:04:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 21:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17895@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Roland Winkler" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 02 23:04:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RhH-0006W3-UE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 23:04:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56483 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RhH-0004ZC-GP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RhE-0004Xs-23 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RhD-0006uo-9M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RhD-0006ui-6c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RhC-000440-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17895 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17895-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17895.140433500215528 (code B ref 17895); Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17895) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2014 21:03:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RgX-00042M-HB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:51178 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RgT-000426-6P for 17895@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:03:19 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RgS-0003rV-Bi; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:03:16 -0400 X-Spook: CIA Rumsfeld covert video crypto anarchy Comirex AVN SAFE X-Ran: #1re`b1h6zDyblx$XZYn`K6%OSCh`(_U?cO5%$tf)8hRV$dNg}dIr%T-'*G:64u~su1Blk X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <29110.37851.774372.21428@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Roland Winkler's message of "Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:55:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91119 Archived-At: "Roland Winkler" wrote: >> (Everyone should use free-format Fortran, where these problems >> were all solved 20+ years ago!) > > All this is obviously not about new code, but it is about > maintaining existing code. > (Also, that's why Emacs comes with fortran-mode and f90-mode. They > serve different needs!) I know, I know. I was just trying to give the bug-gnu-emacs audience who is not familiar with Fortran an impression of the language based on something that is not 25 years obsolete. Do you have any concrete suggestions for changing Emacs's fortran-mode in light of this report? I don't.