From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2161: This might explain it Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:07:45 -0500 Message-ID: <0uocxkw4by.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233635041 17399 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2009 04:24:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 03 05:25:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUCqY-0003r3-NG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:25:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUCpF-0003Hi-Vf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:23:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUCoz-0003Ar-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUCow-00039H-HF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47141 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUCow-00039D-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:23:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49684) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUCov-0004JL-B5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n134NVON008803; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:23:31 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n134F3Ha006406; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:15:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2161 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2161-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2161.12336341805106 (code B ref 2161); Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Feb 2009 04:09:40 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1349XsF005094 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:09:34 -0800 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUCZe-0001Ha-1c; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:07:46 -0500 X-Spook: MIT-LL anthrax Soviet Security Council CDMA HAMASMOIS SRI X-Ran: rM/p=y-=AQct4*}:'Nu0>x>pcQ_if?jV@)EJB/Z@Ce9vCdm!@EAH4EV-W|Bo+rp(|v=#u> X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:23:36 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24874 Archived-At: Richard M Stallman wrote: > Warning (undo): Buffer `RMAIL' undo info was 99232433 bytes long. > The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. > > Maybe some code (in unrmail?) should bind buffer-undo-list to t. Done.