unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
@ 2012-01-23  6:10 Brendan Miller
  2012-01-23  9:15 ` Glenn Morris
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Miller @ 2012-01-23  6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 10584

Specifically, auctex preview-latex is broken. Researching a bit on the
internet indicates that the released version of auctex is incompatible
with recent version of ghostview. The solution is to upgrade to the CVS
version of auctex.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-01-23  6:10 bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken Brendan Miller
@ 2012-01-23  9:15 ` Glenn Morris
  2012-12-02 20:12   ` Glenn Morris
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-01-23  9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brendan Miller; +Cc: 10584

Brendan Miller wrote:

> Specifically, auctex preview-latex is broken.

That's not very specific...

> Researching a bit on the internet indicates that the released version
> of auctex is incompatible with recent version of ghostview. The
> solution is to upgrade to the CVS version of auctex.

I've no idea, but I imagine the GNU ELPA version will be updated when a
fixed AUCTeX release is made. 





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-01-23  9:15 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2012-12-02 20:12   ` Glenn Morris
  2012-12-02 20:13     ` Glenn Morris
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-12-02 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 10584-done

Glenn Morris wrote:

> I've no idea, but I imagine the GNU ELPA version will be updated when a
> fixed AUCTeX release is made. 

Both these things have now happened.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-12-02 20:12   ` Glenn Morris
@ 2012-12-02 20:13     ` Glenn Morris
  2012-12-03 17:20       ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-12-02 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 10584; +Cc: catphive

Glenn Morris wrote:

> Glenn Morris wrote:
>
>> I've no idea, but I imagine the GNU ELPA version will be updated when a
>> fixed AUCTeX release is made. 
>
> Both these things have now happened.

I may have been a little premature. Maybe just the ELPA branch got
updated, not yet the ELPA package. But it should happen soon.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-12-02 20:13     ` Glenn Morris
@ 2012-12-03 17:20       ` Stefan Monnier
  2012-12-05 20:16         ` Tassilo Horn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2012-12-03 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: catphive, 10584

> I may have been a little premature. Maybe just the ELPA branch got
> updated, not yet the ELPA package. But it should happen soon.

The ELPA archive is auto-rebuilt be a nightly script (for
a north-american definition of night).


        Stefan





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-12-03 17:20       ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2012-12-05 20:16         ` Tassilo Horn
  2012-12-05 21:08           ` Stefan Monnier
  2012-12-05 21:11           ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2012-12-05 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: catphive, 10584

Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

>> I may have been a little premature. Maybe just the ELPA branch got
>> updated, not yet the ELPA package. But it should happen soon.
>
> The ELPA archive is auto-rebuilt be a nightly script (for
> a north-american definition of night).

I've reverted my changes on the elpa branch so that auctex 11.86 will be
the current, most recent version again soon.

Sorry for the inconvenience,
Tassilo





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-12-05 20:16         ` Tassilo Horn
@ 2012-12-05 21:08           ` Stefan Monnier
  2012-12-05 21:11           ` Stefan Monnier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2012-12-05 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: catphive, 10584

> I've reverted my changes on the elpa branch so that auctex 11.86 will be
> the current, most recent version again soon.

Thanks,


        Stefan







^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-12-05 20:16         ` Tassilo Horn
  2012-12-05 21:08           ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2012-12-05 21:11           ` Stefan Monnier
  2012-12-06  8:12             ` Tassilo Horn
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2012-12-05 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: catphive, 10584

> I've reverted my changes on the elpa branch so that auctex 11.86 will be
> the current, most recent version again soon.

Actually, I'm sorry for the mess, and I'm partly to blame for it.

With the change I made to the scripts, you could have simply changed the
version number back to 11.86, which would have reverted GNU ELPA to the
11.86 package while letting you hack on the 11.87 code until it's ready
without having to revert it.
But I only realized that you could do this after you had reverted the
code changes.  IOW too late.


        Stefan





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken
  2012-12-05 21:11           ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2012-12-06  8:12             ` Tassilo Horn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2012-12-06  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: catphive, 10584

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I've reverted my changes on the elpa branch so that auctex 11.86 will
>> be the current, most recent version again soon.
>
> Actually, I'm sorry for the mess, and I'm partly to blame for it.
>
> With the change I made to the scripts, you could have simply changed the
> version number back to 11.86, which would have reverted GNU ELPA to the
> 11.86 package while letting you hack on the 11.87 code until it's ready
> without having to revert it.
> But I only realized that you could do this after you had reverted the
> code changes.  IOW too late.

Well, no big deal.

I think, I'll wait for a decision about the auctex to elpa move now.
I'm very much attracted by your idea since I'd really love to be able to
make on-time auctex bugfix releases.  The current release procedure is
hairy, especially for XEmacs and Windows builds.  And the elpa update is
manual and error-prone.  That said, I have no clue about autotools, am
no expert in Makefiles, and all the other stuff that's at least required
for building auctex XEmacs packages.  So while I have a clear
preference, I wouldn't be a great help turning it into reality...

Bye,
Tassilo





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-06  8:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-23  6:10 bug#10584: auctex in gnu repository broken Brendan Miller
2012-01-23  9:15 ` Glenn Morris
2012-12-02 20:12   ` Glenn Morris
2012-12-02 20:13     ` Glenn Morris
2012-12-03 17:20       ` Stefan Monnier
2012-12-05 20:16         ` Tassilo Horn
2012-12-05 21:08           ` Stefan Monnier
2012-12-05 21:11           ` Stefan Monnier
2012-12-06  8:12             ` Tassilo Horn

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).