From: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
To: "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>
Cc: mi-ebugs@kismala.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
61504@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#61504: 29.0.60; executing byte-code from previous build causes SIGSEGV crash
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:46:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f053182b01ca92048da@heytings.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14648C4B-2346-4895-8534-CA4CD9637FD2@acm.org>
>>> By the way, doesn't the patch switch the restoration order of
>>> narrowing and restriction, respectively? Maybe it doesn't matter?
>>
>> Hmmm, that's a good question! The evaluation order of parameters is
>> unspecified in C, so actually the order could be switched or not,
>> depending on what the compiler chooses to do.
>
> Yes, the saving order is undefined but the restoring order seems
> well-defined. It currently restores narrowing locks first, then the
> restriction, but your patch flips the order.
>
Indeed, I misunderstood what you said above, now I got it!
>
> Please at least make the saving order well-defined, preferably in the
> reverse order of restoration for symmetry.
>
I did that.
Thanks again for your review/feedback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 6:33 bug#61504: 29.0.60; executing byte-code from previous build causes SIGSEGV crash Istvan Marko
2023-02-14 9:29 ` Gregory Heytings
2023-02-14 13:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-14 16:50 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-02-14 17:00 ` Gregory Heytings
2023-02-14 17:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-14 20:44 ` Gregory Heytings
2023-02-14 17:21 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-02-14 20:46 ` Gregory Heytings [this message]
2023-02-14 20:32 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-02-14 20:47 ` Gregory Heytings
2023-02-14 15:22 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-02-14 16:00 ` Gregory Heytings
2023-02-14 16:47 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-02-14 16:51 ` Gregory Heytings
2023-02-14 17:36 ` Istvan Marko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f053182b01ca92048da@heytings.org \
--to=gregory@heytings.org \
--cc=61504@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=mattiase@acm.org \
--cc=mi-ebugs@kismala.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).