From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55169: Can't combine window-min-height with window-height Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 09:54:11 +0200 Message-ID: <0e9b53c4-b283-ca20-fa8a-995f2b58ed59@gmx.at> References: <86y1zp5but.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87czh0gp6m.fsf@gnus.org> <9753db0e-05f2-5927-80fb-50d17f16441d@gmx.at> <86czgxi3nn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86tua7pyfp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5e93dcad-4071-b4e2-d408-ba670413eb67@gmx.at> <868rriil03.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 55169@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 09:55:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9rG-0002jv-NJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 09:55:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9rF-0007pN-RW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:55:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9qg-0007mn-EE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9qg-00037s-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9qg-00012f-4R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 07:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55169 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55169-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55169.16516508603953 (code B ref 55169); Wed, 04 May 2022 07:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55169) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2022 07:54:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9q0-00011h-Ku for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:57607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9pz-00011S-MA for 55169@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:54:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1651650853; bh=5msEaf9DGFXog2CGH+/gaakkdtOOMtV/L+tC6TP7Y5E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=W2FZg0h5sSNiRgR94SPMd9/XYvCHacUxRWdSSErkYdLNNq4ZO3ROEib0tiu3D56Uj mYsBIx/4MC7JI/CMm6k1W/UUALlDD3Kcgy48L/HqpLV4yq2yqjF2ICiMnJM/kMJFTa KI4Ku3TsafpjztClh5oWRdPCwsjwrndfEZsMXEvg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.143]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MMGN2-1nVBTu2AwY-00JHfL; Wed, 04 May 2022 09:54:12 +0200 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <868rriil03.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Lu1dzTeUjaGNUxU1aHu8VGSzaG1x6u80ARbOgty6goBLkVZtIic TDA8eZ7r9pQumDzexXn+F/Xb9p9PKuoOEyhk6bqp8/vBs23nBM9R2zeKQvwiezpQMj1yjw2 OG189JhHkq5qZswvO3ewXI6S/sma0sOjQMqxRaf7uwa7svaRu5lrsbSnw1JNInnyUuqCY5W K+LiPLsYdH4lua1BZ4Dhw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:1eElwXl8eA4=:rxKs0ZOOnk7vfWSH8E3S9y f6DtNLC/WM+qMPXvOhb8rirHXoDNzrYGio/cCc9dGMvX47S4rNjUKWUVpD+KW2NXazjZ4Npfz rlGlurSIwBrfeCQ/bKFW8kw5eeHKgQHMyMgcAB1kpPT62CdEYE279LlhDN+6tMYvvo9L0Ik2g Uexz/z7DMR7E/qMY6O3H53X+kjeZLNubuQNWAYmI0jyeMM3YBkCL+1JlxJJDA4woaWVngFDMf 8fVpZwByhHMFTXr5KBKbMb43wQ+xXY6pFzpCW0GVguUa2vbgMmavu58aszyggSM9Y4XScxmA3 21wafIYiaRQjZ4Vbf5Z7Om2uZmHQOlNkzjIYrYXgz5scPAo5c+5PIrV2lAumrWOhNq/8MSjJB jFDnD6f9HmUNB4MoPZFSq3R4ulODXvB+KcA4RfghRF5zrQzwPl4pM3l6YoWYawpjo4nUXnYkN cbxOydi6hH2GKhza1NSdw8IfJ9/bGzAA5hnR9GZ2YDGWvbtH+NiAOY9IEi7ICx7b0uVjLRUnq 5lpvjF8wYiNhbsOQAJDcxoAU743zOXA16LQUbJbrJeQKhylYgYVZBHdpx33S8CImAFHniji5c sU6wzNnS0n/NAD3RQPANPFiTYEQodCULmCxmcRl3vRWeEGm0xwMcuqSI1JqB70KTJYBKavyEE r6UwY6j9GeXik00NJNPV/Bif6RbDwvKEHIvfZjgof/OE7ISl53OnBrj599bkorgX6J1as9zEW VB85sMkiBO+yOUBPFVVy+iF2Qf2k4K1JD+5Y864EbGRBI80mxYIAnHkSWCYfaSf/LvV4IlXb X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:231374 Archived-At: > Do you think it's a too big change in behavior that might break some > existing configs? It introduces a certain inconsistency. So far, 'window-min-height' is obeyed by 'display-buffer-below-selected' only. My patch would have other clients obey it as well - but to a certain extent only. For example, 'split-window-sensibly' will never care whether a window it splits off can be made 'window-min-height' lines high. How would we document that fact? martin