From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16238: 24.3.50; pcase docs (and possibly pcase) wrong Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:13:12 -0500 Message-ID: <0da9fqrorr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87ob46vcfl.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.org> <874n5yuut4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387916043 23642 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 20:14:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 16238@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 21:14:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYMh-0003Ig-Qp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:14:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40322 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYMh-0005tg-Bo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:14:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYMd-0005rJ-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYMc-0001TP-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYMc-0001TL-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYMc-0003tv-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16238.138791599614909 (code B ref 16238); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2013 20:13:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYLr-0003sO-PQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:13:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:37960) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYLp-0003sG-Nn for 16238@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvYLo-00014E-UO; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:13:12 -0500 X-Spook: Ansar al-Islam Ron Brown Medco digicash FTS2000 KGB LLNL X-Ran: +EHS]@3vD4~NrpC6^`l~pLU\&F(?sT~cDdY\$NMS{Wn~)x=e"r/'XlaX;a'l57C4H!Wj\7 X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <874n5yuut4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:34:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82545 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn wrote: >> No, the code is meant for lexical-binding. > > Ok, I see. I've also mentioned that in the docs, though I guess you can > refine that comment to be more specific. That _example_ assumes lexical binding. _Pcase itself_ does not require lexical binding. (You've written in the manual that it does.)