From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34221: [PATCH] Make project-files work with remote files Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 14:05:54 +0300 Message-ID: <0d15361f-962f-2347-e575-faec5ad9c1ab@yandex.ru> References: <8736pds1b1.fsf@gmx.de> <87tvhtgp7r.fsf@gmx.de> <87wommr1b2.fsf@gmx.de> <87imy4kjre.fsf@gmx.de> <37f22e37-9cf7-647e-4fe4-7fa50ae80351@yandex.ru> <87ftt6zgz0.fsf@gmx.de> <87bm3uz8u8.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="220388"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:65.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/65.0 Cc: 34221@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Felici=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A9meth?= To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 12:07:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grhWS-000vE2-Bq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37916 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grhWR-0002kL-Az for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grhWK-0002jq-1T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grhWI-0008GB-9f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grhWI-0008E9-3f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1grhWH-0001fT-MA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 34221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34221.15495375706342 (code B ref 34221); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2019 11:06:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1grhVR-0001eE-MN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com ([209.85.167.45]:43831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1grhVO-0001dg-B8 for 34221@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j1so7812294lfb.10 for <34221@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 03:06:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J6lIYz4hVNEvq8c5ZGeMN4MVd4e9PhvcARYU2KQHtqA=; b=GYirNtxTVqd6wm1H1qUwqp43tSzulIBRVAkk+IMpi5NGuKn2fkkJz2yoxR1xvkPEO/ 7atb786cVNCaRbCnRGqz0gL4R1AwciAhwC5UKOCPEVtE0mIfhXyDqqqKGhNKS3WJ71CL ZWWMprCfMQksLBDe7u5jb0//U/4uGNveIN7Ijno3OaNGpz3QIRNRR7rN9z361/dPzUez nCwZ2MjxuOJ766KOX2BSYsdZ84sQp79c8La/MYFxIsvvY04z6YCWBClWfASHcr7dlUUT qQB7AmdtWCGgVul9iwBsDhlZyg0Az0JLTAYk5D4TcJ4AWGOa75MD3YuEGkWhek+KVr1C n8Xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=J6lIYz4hVNEvq8c5ZGeMN4MVd4e9PhvcARYU2KQHtqA=; b=k+XCttboA/gQXNxeHEiudCkN7fceN3pmv1QV9GDW1yd6LuSoHyhA54lq+Pz10eHILs 2YuNCgYAHcGmHFRHml5E1+uypZl+u0aatAjwmVnqcEzhDj8hixi6yB4kdlW307Erlz3C +moDpWhZn8iFhaENFpXHXe4dEqhfKq+XckWcZI6z8Uvncaq+46yWnJN7COn+jL6hrJIf krYsdeAYS/9pNrYfA9MffT6MKAx7oq1GFXHFsbwghebnLEztzGN62QjLjwFCgAGjjw9o 73fmyZyY5yHB3nivn8h3h04MPT6Hg4nF0MelGnKKmOw+XFKeMD3WK3jhGV0OJ+ORF7xl 5Jqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubrAWWsDmeNSt6zNwwPJNE/HUMsosAUqsq/6sYYWrTbcUgBtv1z f8aCybexrCgnuKDJeQSwvRE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ibqufjsjn8Fk/c7jW6jlSGzOqFRa0me72zBeI2MCL87nQLGPjZiHlseLyBdR3l4OQR8Jd+E3g== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4194:: with SMTP id z20mr6763569lfh.74.1549537560270; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 03:06:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.43.247] ([217.118.78.120]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 18-v6sm4193124ljg.83.2019.02.07.03.05.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 03:05:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bm3uz8u8.fsf@gmx.de> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155217 Archived-At: On 02.02.2019 15:13, Michael Albinus wrote: > Sure, I'm aware of this difference. But there is (length obarray) => 15121 > in my running Emacs stanza, and I doubt that so many files are handled > in project-files at once. Emacs contains ~4000 files. > And even if there are so many files, the other > operations on them will rule out this difference. So yes, I believe > this is negligible. Why not benchmark, then? I see a stable difference in project-files's runtime, on the order of 1-4%. It's not a lot, but why create conses when we don't have to.