From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:00:50 +0300 Message-ID: <0c8cf5132c962fa7a3655d7bbc63d0e8bbc95727.camel@yandex.ru> References: <20230213200006.663502-1-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> <20230216150509.27039-1-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> <87pma9mxxe.fsf@gmail.com> <2bee6d8548acde05ef32f2c46119f16380e5b817.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12880"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 Cc: 61490@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 18:02:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pShe8-000370-8d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:02:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pShdg-0007rP-7J; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:01:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pShd0-0007Lx-SP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pShd0-0002Q5-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pShd0-00018h-Eb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61490 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61490-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61490.16765668564354 (code B ref 61490); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61490) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2023 17:00:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pShcu-000188-FW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from forward501c.mail.yandex.net ([178.154.239.209]:33882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pShcr-00017z-DX for 61490@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:00:55 -0500 Original-Received: from sas8-92ddc00f49ef.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas8-92ddc00f49ef.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c1b:2988:0:640:92dd:c00f]) by forward501c.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 342005ECDF; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:00:51 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by sas8-92ddc00f49ef.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id o0pipVCYnW21-0QoUaD4M; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:00:50 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1676566850; bh=p7bN6vB1+Lfu/EaOkQxobI44XL8mHa0EkOf7U27WFMw=; h=References:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; b=upe7xmLkqd9/N50szzHXr4vDOrNlbrTXecfp88GKjUYoGaM6lthNGs/A0A75eftbu evZL0avfoLbVI58sZc0HkE3tS1yQQio+q3SJWpUd21XjVaxL1L+B08srmNjf71P+yM LiQz6DMv//FxRx8LgcdrAWmoL12xtELZ6/lsv4XM= Authentication-Results: sas8-92ddc00f49ef.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru In-Reply-To: <2bee6d8548acde05ef32f2c46119f16380e5b817.camel@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255825 Archived-At: On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 19:48 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 16:29 +0100, Robert Pluim wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:05:09 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov > > > > > > > said: > >=20 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> Originally discovered by Tyler Dodge in = his article > > "Significant Garbage > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> Collection Improvement For Emacs". > >=20 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> While testing this change on Archlinux s= ystem with Intel i5- > > 7200U CPU, > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> average time of garbage collection gets = reduced by =E2=89=8825%. > > Other > > users > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> report improvements up to 50%. While mon= itoring PSS of emacs > > with and > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> without customizations loaded before and= after the patch, no > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> statistically significant differences we= re discovered. So > > overall, this > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Konstantin> change is a win. > >=20 > > I haven=CA=BCt tested it yet, but it looks reasonable. > >=20 > > Procedural nit: if you put the bug number in the commit message rather > > than the Subject, then 'git am' will strip the [PATCH v2] prefix for > > us. >=20 > I am not sure I understood. I did not put the bug number in the subject a= t > all, > it is probably done by debbugs. E.g. if you look at this v2 patch in a br= owser > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D61490#20=C2=A0the "Subjec= t" line > displayed there does not contain a bug number. >=20 > I can add a bug number to the body the next time, but I'm not sure it wou= ld > make > debbugs stop adding the prefix. Which kind of makes sense btw, because debbugs is a bugtracker, I don't thi= nk its developers supposed that it will be used as a replacement to a mailing = list for patch submissions. To track patches the old-fashioned way people usuall= y combine a mailing list with `patchwork` interface. Linux-kernel are doing t= hat for a long time. Freedesktop were doing that too. These days projects are typically just using git forges.