From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57837: 29.0.50; fit-window-to-buffer should reposition the buffer Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:10:30 +0000 Message-ID: <0b5f34d9bcce2a80fa88@heytings.org> References: <84acc36e7e03e4cba89d@heytings.org> <84acc36e7e748d1b29fd@heytings.org> <83a66y3390.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35591"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57837@debbugs.gnu.org, sds@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 09:11:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyp-000941-7a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:11:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyn-0004tW-Sr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyg-0004tG-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyg-0000si-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyg-0007cr-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57837.166339863429279 (code B ref 57837); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2022 07:10:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyE-0007cB-1V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:45622) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZRyC-0007c0-8l for 57837@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:10:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663398630; bh=Xhuw8P0q6GlTIhAKWKxsvmExBS7pvDriFFbEbGnNpW8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=rU9imBhhw3rbpyTNRazUyiOX9ncqyznu76WSuE80yEUk+Z1EpoI6eRsvIsglgS7mx 1Q/gSiyKEQrwAhv0t5Wn/ab+UxiO1WwsfRlIhFeR1yydS2TES/n1Kgw1zUeuqOWOwd MyXEEWXB6uSa+m3gdzLcSiDF45wqaqpYL578NF/HOKrAD8qr00NKrdR0XXqXj8zYNk Vs8Ge+aWmu/D6sBJpCeZj7fzG+A4qRczGfWSc2IK2Af+M+YLQMmGuvjdbrvEouJLYu 1q4pjgSOgxK9v+zNjzdJSFg0+jCV4NBQLR5ZBst7QWI7s5ApwsbMjocWqNGje5j0j+ 6MLr1HQ08QROQ== In-Reply-To: <83a66y3390.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242837 Archived-At: >>>>>> Is that a problem? I mean, is it possible for the point to be >>>>>> invisible? >>>> >>>> No, Emacs does its best to ensure that point is always visible. >>> >>> is it possible for Emacs return nil from (pos-visible-in-window-p >>> (point)) >> >> It is not impossible, but if it happens, it's a bug. > > Actually, it _is_ possible and is not a bug, but only as long as > redisplay didn't happen. > Indeed, I wrote too fast. What I meant, in the context of the discussion, was: It is not impossible after redisplay, but if it happens, it's a bug.