From: "Clément Pit-Claudel" <cpitclaudel@gmail.com>
To: 39585@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Subject: bug#39585: after-change-functions called with invalid positions in call-process
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:56:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a3d3423-965f-4681-b6e2-04b8c1a36a6a@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Recent changes in call-process have introduced surprising behavior in after-change-functions (and caused bugs in flycheck, e.g. https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/issues/1677). From the documentation, I expected that functions added to the after-change-functions hook would be called only with valid positions. However, the following snippets shows that it's not the case:
(defun ~/after-change (beg end len)
(message "(after-change %S %S %S); (buffer %S %S %S)"
beg end len (point-min) (point-max) (buffer-size)))
(with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "*tmp*")
(make-variable-buffer-local 'after-change-functions)
(add-hook 'after-change-functions #'~/after-change)
(call-process "echo" nil t t "Hello"))
Running it repeatedly, this is what I observe:
(after-change 7 13 0); (buffer 1 7 6)
(after-change 13 19 0); (buffer 1 13 12)
(after-change 19 25 0); (buffer 1 19 18)
(after-change 25 31 0); (buffer 1 25 24)
Note how each time the after-change-functions hook is called with a region past the end of the buffer. It's as if after-change-functions was in fact call right before the insertion, instead of after.
Previous versions of Emacs didn't call after-change-functions in this case; it seems that the new behavior was introduced by this commit:
commit 224e8d146485ce178086549d41fa8359dcc0e03e
Author: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Date: Wed Jan 22 19:50:30 2020 +0000
Make call_process call signal_after_change. This fixes bug #38691.
Now, functions such as call-proess-region invoke after-change-functions
correctly.
* src/callproc.c (call_process): Call prepare_to_modify_buffer in a single
place, no longer delegating the task to insert_1_both, etc. Call
signal_after_change in each of two code branches, such that
before-change-functions and after-change-functions are always called in
balanced pairs.
Alan, is this behavior expected?
Thanks,
Clément.
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 3:56 Clément Pit-Claudel [this message]
2020-02-13 19:15 ` bug#39585: after-change-functions called with invalid positions in call-process Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a3d3423-965f-4681-b6e2-04b8c1a36a6a@gmail.com \
--to=cpitclaudel@gmail.com \
--cc=39585@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=acm@muc.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).