From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Wiesner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17839: 24.4.50; read-passwd echoes password input in non-interactive sessions Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:12:27 +0200 Message-ID: <0BFC2B2F-DF0B-41AE-B0E1-AD67E3C2086A@lunaryorn.com> References: <1990658.6gzIWbjLAl@lunaryorn> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407417204 762 80.91.229.3 (7 Aug 2014 13:13:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 13:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, 17839@debbugs.gnu.org, Michael Albinus To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 15:13:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNVL-0003S1-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:13:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46396 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNVL-0000VC-1V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNVC-0000Uu-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNV8-0003SQ-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNV7-0003SJ-To for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNV7-0005dO-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Wiesner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17839.140741715721628 (code B ref 17839); Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2014 13:12:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNUj-0005cm-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:12:37 -0400 Original-Received: from vega.uberspace.de ([95.143.172.245]:38983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XFNUb-0005cX-W8 for 17839@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 13075 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2014 13:12:28 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (HELO hostname.fritz.box) (127.0.0.1) by vega.uberspace.de with SMTP; 7 Aug 2014 13:12:28 -0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92256 Archived-At: Am 07.08.2014 um 15:01 schrieb Stefan Monnier = : >> I know, but I'd argue that since it's kind of a security issue, = albeit >> small, it deserves a timely fix. YMMV, though, and I'm ok with >> either decision you make. >=20 > I'm OK with installing a fix for it in emacs-24, but the fix we have = in > trunk is not "obviously safe" enough to be appropriate for emacs-24. I know. > And I think the warning we added to emacs-24 is a sufficient (tho not > ideal) stop-gap for emacs-24. Ok. >=20 > IOW feel free to send a safer patch (with corresponding copyright > paperwork, of course), I don=92t think that I=92m competent enough to do that. If I understand = correctly, Windows support is the main issue, and I do not use Windows. Besides, you know my opinion of your copyright paperwork, and it hasn=92t = changed lately. I won=92t contribute to Emacs.=