From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59956: 29.0.60: Failure when completing arguments in Eshell after variable interpolation Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:28:42 +0000 Message-ID: <07bcf6a532d0428b9f53@heytings.org> References: <83iliiv0yv.fsf@gnu.org> <765547c0-b2a5-b054-a29d-b27002b7442c@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20159"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Jim Porter , Eli Zaretskii , arstoffel@gmail.com, 59956@debbugs.gnu.org, John Wiegley To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 15:29:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bi6-00054m-AC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:29:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bhw-00009i-IH; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bhu-00009I-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bhu-0002BB-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bhu-0006F3-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59956 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59956-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59956.167120092823986 (code B ref 59956); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2022 14:28:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bhf-0006Eo-TP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:28:48 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:32842) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Bhc-0006Ei-2j for 59956@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:28:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1671200922; bh=csn0mxC6I3ndw6d7ATThjfwowWAQ9JP7/1A3jwSLs3U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=sEVVYsWEQDYBeh6uTyN7+SgWAofxeAhyi1fnLQAw9HvPwLQCEq7UR0YbolfOJXUdn Yb89QdiGDhZxd0QpTy6h7gjsxT29+bGL+4c2nVG5zA8W/vnRJtCH4C59N1oH3UMfhk dGQLF8u15juU2QYFhX7fKJ2yYDrlXO2WENNui3rQJVMDinbKUvE49xj6NA9iRz4Mcb 21sYF2BfxZxY2cGcPgioDBiN/2CINMdONgE7sp4mlviJP/yFWKLsYG7bDYbJB9gEeL QOOQYOJT3QSYUgvkr4J2HrRh1WpnBcpXvTFXxItI96KK0GvFIJHx8cUswZ6Vg+5+pE JHAeNYSqP+WeQ== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:251207 Archived-At: > > A "general" solution might be the one below > Why not (format "%s" (nth (+ (pcase ...))))? > > tho it looks more like a general workaround, I think. > Indeed, I think it would be better if pcomplete could see the unexpanded argument instead of its expansion.