From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35784: emacs 26 crash Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 19:30:50 +0200 Message-ID: <07948e24-aeab-9ac8-9d0d-b3a704c58b08@gmx.at> References: <1558126467.3148.9.camel@bloodnok.com> <83ftpc9ted.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhnkc5zg.fsf@gmail.com> <87woindevp.fsf@gmail.com> <83y33393g0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="266530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35784@debbugs.gnu.org, marc@bloodnok.com To: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 18 19:32:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Bs-0017Cq-Ca for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 19:32:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Br-0005kE-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Bl-0005j6-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Bj-0000VB-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Bh-0000LI-Py for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Bh-00082o-LZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 17:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35784 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35784.155820066630856 (code B ref 35784); Sat, 18 May 2019 17:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2019 17:31:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3An-00081b-Vf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:52635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3Al-000816-5a for 35784@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:31:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1558200652; bh=k7ZPaJR2jd1Xlgzc98N9uC+c047WC8MV8YWtTNUQENM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CYbcz1r/BZFTlDPsnkhHBtNShgvP8/vx+2q7v09YmzPNDl8r1kMo/Thq2e+1ZHwT5 jhtygPNw1VbmIY2QB08rjjoWV8IGcVwrejQdS84kJYc/osDxPwpB4a8AU6S7WK0VCy lMbpWLf0Ie4E1/iiDv/jz7jxz6eeEt3VUzWGv3J8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.142]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Likl3-1gwZph1Y0D-00d1xP; Sat, 18 May 2019 19:30:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83y33393g0.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:sStPwiiDJ8nw2ZdwYBy+ZZkMgs6F24ZOpbkMpGbr8JJ4adS1QoT D8ULYcmRUuuP+uxf7fNXaRJpK+rV1KVkToecH5+NyruLnRP6Z2826+rfwd0II22UQPZBkIv 4uRHEcQFxQJt6q1xRpELfDuPvZHXyo+w7yEz/6TrVcwdCAkQnTV4k7/qmGIb9igsf22nT72 z2eWCQSISWOJpAl9kfYEw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:NJT8S0fny+c=:NLZo2vRjj+P4G2syM7aEwk HZ69cYBfyJmtUK+fR16Qd7+hAR1tOMi8BnnfKp3W7s8MNQJIvABUabpG2ZJMzEtW5msUNv+uj 5v2SV6mp2Dsida0WJm+nlqOiOAX5eNZL8qsw0/uuP1DvnXkPo/vcbinGL2g+aRubDqkjGCJWH hIDT3QMiXK0nDtxPIT7XrMY2u/PCZeiuVM/lRoe9SGKl1RkMOBqCRdA2lh5eb2PaX4gUUVQj+ fQfIQ6Ggh/4f/Ml5F5238u/HnI4ij6KtTRav0epoOcyy6fR0sxOBecfBPWIu5gjRjTvQ9/BjT fgLwmsTxaBABsh4BD6f4fXROVgiYupaGcfPhzBJOJhJafJmLxpuQ0Nblr8DFhvzY6XXHgKJ97 yolAGR9yyfnAWQVzXtPopCaGTm+DnYMS0CGM6Rw7BVoZjbVWUZeSWSuUPJSHUbt8CaUn/EFBW RUhA6msBzpeeKNWs892TUOsYPcEnc49Fa7t/GcQmV24BvntqSRA5j5ZiR8TPPBAFC+gzB5qTi LOH54zXZ5c3OOTwDT4ZSx9qJxo4y49zPmuAsL5kYWk1vkWeXr8N6xAo0wihoCXJgpuu9lv8em 3GJZ0w68jLWP08oadHivb324FaJWkfktyh9HhnkGRGXS3g+19k5h7w9F7i70GKEvPayYO7Yly /DRp+EZjFN/i7l0+mwMlNn05M8dQ2Le5hlulMmCNk0/2/yCPCyplL9kamTjDuySfA1HeUaMRj NM9T54FZ8GS42t9WGF0nSXbpgdzP8IIF7bNDDJEBHSLiC0ac/wgNu1LcwcmJM3du7n2jWYmu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159502 Archived-At: >> #2 0x000000000061849e in die (msg=0x743f3f "BUFFERP (a)", >> file=0x743f36 "buffer.h", line=914) at alloc.c:7406 >> #3 0x00000000005802b3 in XBUFFER (a=0) at buffer.h:914 >> #4 0x0000000000468bb3 in mark_window_display_accurate_1 (w=0x558e410, >> accurate_p=false) at xdisp.c:14754 >> b = 0x7ffe74b60e40 >> #5 0x0000000000468ffd in mark_window_display_accurate >> (window=89711637, accurate_p=false) at xdisp.c:14811 >> w = 0x558e410 >> #6 0x00000000004bbe06 in Fforce_window_update (object=89711637) at >> window.c:3643 >> w = 0x558e410 > > This seems to imply that we are trying to update a non-leaf window, > something that should never happen. There's no Lisp-level backtrace, > so it's hard to tell what Lisp called force-window-update, and how the > window in question became non-leaf, but maybe some crazy Lisp hook > switched windows behind redisplay's back or something. I'd rather guess that this is the result of 'kill-buffer' called from 'delete-frame-functions' or 'delete-frame' called from 'kill-buffer-hook'. But at the moment I can't reproduce the bug here any more. martin