From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47574: 'match' face is too bright Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:57:43 +0300 Message-ID: <04d1b7b8-eba2-7adb-c195-8a38ff13f8e5@yandex.ru> References: <83wntjeus0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21802"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: 47574@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 15 16:02:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2Zp-0005Z2-BM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:02:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50956 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2Zo-0008Ju-Cf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:02:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VO-00049M-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VO-0001J3-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VO-0001u0-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47574.16184950787302 (code B ref 47574); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2021 13:57:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VJ-0001th-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:57:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:50865) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VE-0001tQ-AL for 47574@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id u20so7987119wmj.0 for <47574@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 06:57:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CBuKQqTmEUuNrAV1Na2dga0aFmvLd2MUOJbEdXWitVo=; b=Yyc+OXjiFZcUcqGoYOhjXMGiaZsii16vuTMiPdBJus3hpqEEP+FSuJfZ0z/dUx5neD CDmCCaJsGS2KODO8DUPVAnN3aWdFv9DdYZH7AfBigbiXau/0Vte8NFOuD2DgHQKjE09O wN4SFTzYf6mOcBbjGvZlTFxG27LYhmmE7mQInOVAMO4CrhHOgL8ZTbXsx5EYOBIZ/7iT moKrhQKb7lb6apMqj2NAJRkGqIGIqGggP2ArOvetlwCLV8xpAsvK0Z20MIsWpn9/MHtM DiaWlQlIprbtifqGZPUyVu7NWme2AvEHkDH93qa6znJgS50HhxjGoqX61Fr10CcSGBxE 507g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CBuKQqTmEUuNrAV1Na2dga0aFmvLd2MUOJbEdXWitVo=; b=JGz2Qyr+E50ZGFZGQFSwMxyAQrXkp621lbLnrISqv5fgmMtU4XkY+T1f0J0ntTbLs7 KeNitA7Hts+Jd8Q+pvDN4neaG1XDG313Ks2veicicn8hJ3/KTxUw88hv/8t06QzvH5Td d288SPGe6SQw6wA/RVGKN6NMPp8Oz+q5PXY+8HSpdk0+cu+smsHizuadzbGEag5zQMKM /oAuCXXB176vsuY/k+mkrHWDQZAWvL5WMNR4WW58sjYpYcrX+JO4Wc1KJO7WLIPi6fEq 9R35f2ZbJdRRPAcaxigXCm8Zcsm98Y4ZCqH+YfXNXclPfbIFYwZ7JbEL8Pqy+oyl8NdK MiJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bA1pQW+OhiuSI5lm6EYre0leFO2uUJbXbKuenY0/mJO7j7geq wIuUev6uoSM8bbzvgI23WAqGUzsC1FM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGlY68mNKnEk0oSVF+YN9GlvpqWH1XdDF8np0rA+p1eCBL8vENmPUkDUGElVeTfukAdlE/1A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a914:: with SMTP id s20mr3358685wme.106.1618495066380; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 06:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm3485120wru.47.2021.04.15.06.57.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204065 Archived-At: On 14.04.2021 17:55, Stefan Kangas wrote: > [Resending my reply as I accidentally sent it only to Eli.] > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> Juri suggested #ffff88, and it seems good to me. Both readable and >>> noticeable, yet not too bright. > > I don't see a very large difference between yellow and #ffff88, but I > guess it's slightly better than what we have now. What do people think about #ffffbb, then? It's the other color Juri mentioned. Stefan? Eli? It's also relatively low-key like "lemon chiffon", but a bit more noticeable. And it seems to fit the default theme very well. >>> My original suggestions were "lemon chiffon" (seems ideally subdued to >>> me, but it would be a drastic change), "khaki1" or "light goldenrod". > > FWIW, I think "lemon chiffon" is by far the best one. It also fits > better with the rest of the default theme. > > This is followed by "khaki1" or "light goldenrod", in that order. I guess we'll fall back to "khaki1" if the more radical options are not accepted. > I'm not against #ffff88 if that's what people want to see, but the > change is not large enough to make much of a difference here. > >> If we change the face's colors, we should make sure the new colors >> look well on both light and dark backgrounds. > > Yup. > > I think "khaki3" stands out sufficiently well and goes well together > with "lemon chiffon", but there is obviously room for experimentation. If we're talking about dark background, it should be at least khaki4 (the text is hard to read otherwise), or the RoyalBlue4 I suggested as the tweak for the current dark-bg color of this face. Although the current RoyalBlue3 seems to have about the same level of brightness as khaki4. So it's not out of the question to just leave the current color there. If we change the dark-bg color to khaki, I think we'd also need to change the spec for ((class color) (min-colors 8) (background dark)), and setting it to "yellow" is probably not a good idea. Wish we had some dark-background users in this discussion.