From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 02:37:24 +0300 Message-ID: <04c3e90b-a9a8-724d-1f2c-98c43e9f9658@yandex.ru> References: <87mtoux1ha.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfyhj3qw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgsoctoc.fsf@gnus.org> <59a05468-2309-c6e7-5a2a-51426c208966@yandex.ru> <87tuiv4hvc.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsudsngq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k0jora9d.fsf@gnus.org> <7ba6c699-cfe5-4fa3-92dd-55b1e227aacf@yandex.ru> <874kaptwki.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878rz5pc9i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ily91djz.fsf@gnu.org> <878rz5w9cf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ee8x1bn8.fsf@gnu.org> <834k9t0z9d.fsf@gnu.org> <83v929ynpt.fsf@gnu.org> <03e150fc-5825-16ee-9022-db53de43dbc1@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36241"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: 50344@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, juri@linkov.net To: Filipp Gunbin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 14 01:38:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1manp6-0009FF-6M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 01:38:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54706 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1manp4-00052P-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1manox-00052G-8V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1manow-00089n-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1manow-00019g-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 23:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50344.16341682564404 (code B ref 50344); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 23:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2021 23:37:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33961 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1manoV-00018x-Ut for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:40673) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1manoS-00018i-8j for 50344@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id y15so18929735lfk.7 for <50344@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OGLrQvs2SsdcxZh0PLrhWuEQ0dgWx5l5g/P8LiuTuPQ=; b=o9XC9/OXSwH/VR/Zr8jL1rxqmqGbr6cuYP/1WU7sNk0zo/DNEzyxVtssiul9ZL52Gw up0jWeit2jXXp01+g3qFEdvm4y0XJqwPqNQLsPhvGb9TZsIEALmMraB/3HuFomsCAiAF OQGfkrv/xriE0p9zZUxM6f1e9ZEjxr48KgU/XwQC3UL+P6gFBOBL2v40kBRIUdsB9eW7 76rA06M+FDgUwW196F5TWIaQo030s6xaRfvte4EELqmiZ+Ci9E7SSMwa8kwx2uDqTMqc NosTNdXxm/hahwW4LXKGPbrGtBvt9nXEsFFfdhnO422SmquHPxp3/UlF5yJt1++8OnCz xIyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OGLrQvs2SsdcxZh0PLrhWuEQ0dgWx5l5g/P8LiuTuPQ=; b=LQRYhIlbxGooWPWpXBV2TY7cKgPguowHGN0gx/peTAnjlI9Lbxp/cPxkXFFuphg6oS 9kmh/buqztDMs0Hh9ohftt4VajJWqEzCAFg1sxEXYPaoyGShhV8TvG5+6b3AOE7uBCUb StbvFSgEfwqxRJi3lf3bBfrBB94GEsbjM7V5ZawA2ZALcw4Cd7hIVBLAKdLYb8Gd+Rtb uLpFgDjhfj5GGIxrBupAvN5rt2uQerXwjymR6SOdc218f9ep/tvSqhT4jOT5etNHN/tp GLWmHM2ImF2EStCj/w8vlC9+bP0qRbEoYnkF68JK0AZ9VMCKTwHMXUtDdY1Yc+VTnKP2 4CtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Fi2ZQ2yVJj9/B5Sr2+NoUM3ZIogybvEX/ulBlgs1Ctta6FSLL GxYZn1WramiTuznh5TGhASA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxltB0CX2+0tT0/GkL1bNZO3/j8YRrvhGiz3kkwtnv8gYpPFMB3hW18TQFcr0OzWkqfCmEPCQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46c4:: with SMTP id p4mr1806439lfo.157.1634168245956; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([5.18.248.29]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a5sm75246lff.300.2021.10.13.16.37.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:37:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:217187 Archived-At: On 13.10.2021 13:12, Filipp Gunbin wrote: >> OK, then I guess the follow-up question is, do we obsolete >> 'vc-transfer-file' as well? It's the only caller of 'vc-switch-backend' >> outside of interactive invocations. >> >> 'vc-transfer-file' can also be used by 'C-u M-x vc-next-action', but it >> seems like a very rare workflow as well. Though more plausible than the >> use of 'vc-switch-backend' by itself. > Personally I don't use either of these commands, so this is a question > to others.. I guess there's little point to be too ambitious here, given that vc-transfer-file is not interactive, and changing vc-next-action's signature is not in the cards now anyway. And we don't have an actual mechanism for obsoleting only a part of command's calling convention. I have pushed the change which obsoletes vc-switch-backend now. Which should remove the main obstacle to adding the branches map with good binding in Emacs 29.