From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39215: Hyperlinks to man pages in doc strings Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:32:04 +1200 Message-ID: <044b569f944f35c102c364f2ebfcea8a@webmail.orcon.net.nz> References: <87h80pmbn5.fsf@marxist.se> <83iml4x1mc.fsf@gnu.org> <835zh4wxwt.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfpyj23k.fsf@marxist.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8624"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Orcon Webmail Cc: Richard Stallman , 39215@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 03:33:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwZ5-00023L-0D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 03:33:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwZ3-0006Qc-2v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwYo-0006QM-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwYn-0003x0-Sf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwYn-0006Cy-NH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Phil Sainty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 01:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39215 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39215.163253353823794 (code B ref 39215); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 01:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2021 01:32:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwY5-0006Bi-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:49103) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwY3-0006BW-1T for 39215@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=31653 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTwXs-0003Nx-SN; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:32:05 +1200 Original-Received: from ip-203-94-48-127.kinect.net.nz ([203.94.48.127]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:32:04 +1200 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: psainty@orcon.net.nz X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215374 Archived-At: On 2021-09-25 13:07, Stefan Kangas wrote: > "\\<[Mm]an[ \t\n]+\\(?:page\\)[ \t\n]+\\(?:for[ > \t\n]\\)?['`‘\"]\\([^'’\"]+\\)['’\"]" Was "\\(?:page\\)[ \t\n]+" meant to be "\\(?:page[ \t\n]+\\)?" ? That would be almost the same as "for" except I note that there's no allowance for more than one whitespace char after "for", so maybe that needs changing as well? -Phil