From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17118: 24.3 build on Centos 6.5: undefined ref to `g_settings_get_value Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:26:13 -0400 Message-ID: <01k3bcwpre.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <8cy4zvpr93.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5336B83B.6040306@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396135635 27328 80.91.229.3 (29 Mar 2014 23:27:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Klaus.Zeitler@alcatel-lucent.com" , "17118@debbugs.gnu.org" <17118@debbugs.gnu.org> To: "Jan D." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 30 00:27:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2ea-0007uA-5K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 00:27:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2eZ-0005Rh-Jz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2eV-0005P9-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2eU-0005bf-EM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2eU-0005bb-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2eT-0002FY-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17118 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17118-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17118.13961355798594 (code B ref 17118); Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17118) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2014 23:26:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2dm-0002EY-F1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34931) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2dj-0002EJ-Fp for 17118@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WU2dh-0008WH-DQ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:26:13 -0400 X-Spook: subversive S Key ammunition Iran Aldergrove BRLO X-Ran: 4NlxKx1*<(PcptyS&y.7C#g^z-s,5"w>Wn,>7$L"Hs}#!CXvwtlTS#9H4} (Jan D.'s message of "Sun, 30 Mar 2014 00:01:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87550 Archived-At: "Jan D." wrote: >> Thank you. I think it should be in the emacs-24 branch. What do you think? > > There is a workaround (--without-gsettings) so it is not critical. It only affects RHEL/CentOS. It is not a regression either. So no. Well, emacs-24 is not in the "regression only" stage yet. It hasn't even started pretesting. By the time 24.5 is out, RHEL7 probably will be, and this won't even be relevant any more.