From: Daniel Mendler via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 74556@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74556: 30.0.92; Package upgrade can fail and results in deleted package
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:05:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfl3h93m.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v7vvz0ay.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sat, 07 Dec 2024 20:48:53 +0000")
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Cc: 74556@debbugs.gnu.org
>>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>>> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:34:51 +0000
>>>
>>> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> > It might make sense to try and "deactivate" a package before installing
>>> > the new package. Looking into some second-try fallback for
>>> > package-install to refresh the package index if a package was not found
>>> > would also be a good idea ^^
>>>
>>> This might do it?
>>
>> Philip, please install this on the emacs-30 branch, unless you see any
>> problems with the change. We'd like to make another pretest soon.
>
> Done. But we should keep the report open as there might be better
> approaches to discuss in the future.
Hello Philip,
I just tried the modified `package-upgrade' function and it doesn't seem
to work. It seems to break the upgrade procedure in an even worse way,
at least in my setup. Now `package-install' is tried first with the
package symbol, which will be a no-op, since the package is already
installed. Afterwards the package is deleted and we always end up with
no package. Probably `package-install' should also be called with a
package descriptor of the new package version?
Thanks!
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 11:37 bug#74556: 30.0.92; Package upgrade can fail and results in deleted package Daniel Mendler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-28 11:11 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-11-28 11:34 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-07 12:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-07 20:48 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-10 15:05 ` Daniel Mendler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2024-12-10 20:12 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-10 20:24 ` Daniel Mendler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-12-10 20:31 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-11 3:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-11 3:34 ` Philip Kaludercic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfl3h93m.fsf@daniel-mendler.de \
--to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=74556@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=mail@daniel-mendler.de \
--cc=philipk@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).