From: Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: rekado@elephly.net, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr>,
me@tobias.gr, 39885@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39885: Bioconductor tarballs are not archived
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:14:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1bkwfly.fsf@ngyro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmr7kr23.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:23:48 +0100")
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> Cool!
>
> Can we consider that this report is now done? Because:
>
> 1. SWH supports ExtID and nar hash lookup.
>
> 2. Missing origins are currently ingested by SWH.
> (via specific sources.json)
I think that would be jumping the gun a little bit.
In some sense, the report is only *done* when “stored” hits 100% (or
close to it, with the remainder being stuff we are pretty sure no longer
exists). This won’t happen just because of your second point there.
When the historical “sources.json” is loaded, things will be much, much,
better, sure. Sources will still be missing, though. To me, this is an
invitation to more subtle analysis, like weighing sources by their
“importance” in the package graph. Then there’s still shortcomings with
Disarchive that have to be resolved (which is work best guided by
numbers in the report).
Also, it will always be a good idea to verify that things are working.
Ideally this could be simpler (leveraging ExtID lookup) and continuous.
-- Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 15:59 bug#39885: Bioconductor URI, fallback and time-machine zimoun
2020-03-23 21:20 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-05-21 23:29 ` zimoun
2020-06-24 11:07 ` zimoun
2020-06-28 20:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-06-29 17:36 ` zimoun
2020-06-29 20:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-11-19 14:22 ` zimoun
2021-11-22 19:48 ` zimoun
2022-07-18 16:03 ` zimoun
2022-07-18 16:21 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-08-10 18:25 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-08-10 19:44 ` Maxime Devos
2022-08-10 19:48 ` Maxime Devos
2022-09-09 17:23 ` zimoun
2024-01-08 15:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-08 15:34 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-01-11 16:11 ` Simon Tournier
2023-12-22 13:40 ` bug#39885: Bioconductor tarballs are not archived Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-08 9:09 ` Simon Tournier
2024-01-08 15:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-10 12:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-01-10 15:23 ` Simon Tournier
2024-01-19 15:46 ` Timothy Sample
2024-01-23 9:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-02-14 15:23 ` Simon Tournier
2024-02-16 16:14 ` Timothy Sample [this message]
2024-02-19 16:50 ` Simon Tournier
2024-02-21 18:16 ` Timothy Sample
2023-12-22 20:57 ` bug#39885: Bioconductor URI, fallback and time-machine Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-02 9:20 ` Simon Tournier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y1bkwfly.fsf@ngyro.com \
--to=samplet@ngyro.com \
--cc=39885@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr \
--cc=me@tobias.gr \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).